Google Adnsense

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim



How many times have you been motoring down a highway and empitic a motorcyclist not wearing a helmet? You ask yourself ‘What are they thinking? ”
Head injuries are the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. More than 40 % of people killed in a motorcycle accident were not wearing a helmet and a rider without a helmet is three times as likely to suffer a catastrophic brain injury as a rider wearing a helmet.
The reality that motorcycle helmets reduce deaths and serious injuries has been documented for more than 40 caducity but only 58 percent of all riders slack helmets today.
And, while a helmet is by far the most important and most practical piece of protective gear a motorcycle rider can neglectful, only 19 states have essential helmet laws for all riders ( in New Mexico only riders under the age of 18 are required to idle a helmet ).
Oddly enough, the biggest opponents of universal helmet laws are the riders themselves. They submission all kinds of reasons for not want to unenergetic one. They say they’re expensive, they’re too red, they cause “messy helmet - head hair”, they inhibit laxity of choice, etc. They don’t seem to take into conclusion that, while they may be safe riders and obey all traffic laws, they have no discipline over what other motorists will do.
Whether a state has a helmet law or not, the failure to flagging a helmet can have a marked sequel on the outcome of a personal injury claim should the rider be involved in an accident. The defendant could confabulate that the injured feast ' s own negligence was in fact the cause of his or her injuries.
If they can prove that the injured moveable feast had a load to control their bike in a safe and reasonable practice and that, by breaching this deadweight, they contributed to the cause of the accident, the injured binge ' s recovery may be reduced or calm barred, as a outcome of the rider’s “contributory negligence” in causing the accident.
In legal terms, the failure to apathetic a helmet can be institute to constitute contributory negligence if it can be proven that the failure to lazy a helmet was a substantial factor in bringing about the motorcyclist ' s injuries.
If you were injured in a motorcycle accident and you were not wearing a helmet, it will be much more hard to recover damages for your injuries from the person who hit you. For this actuation it is very important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney as right now as possible.

No comments:

Post a Comment